注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

张军的博客

复旦大学中国经济研究中心主任

 
 
 

日志

 
 
关于我
张军  

张军

网易考拉推荐

china's financial fetish  

2007-02-05 19:30:03|  分类: 默认分类 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |

下文是最近发表于Project Syndicate 2007上的评论文章,它已被翻译成了7种文字在全球数十家报纸发表。其他文字版本可访问以下网地 http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/zhang3

China's Financial Fetish

Jun Zhang

Jun Zhang
 

With the drum beating for the development of the costal areas of Tianjin near Beijing, the curtain seems to be rising on yet another "financial center" in China. When Shanghai sought a similar role several years ago, bankers and investors around the world wondered whether the aim was really for Shanghai to replace Hong Kong as China's financial heart. In the current pilot project, Tianjin in China's north and Shanghai in the south are competing against each other, prompting even more second-guessing.

Once upon a time, no one had any idea about how to create a "financial center." A financial center was simply a great metropolis where enormous financial dealings took place. Cities such as London and New York became known as financial centers only after they had proved themselves in the role.

Policymakers in China seem to be unaware that many major cities have not had the luck to become financial centers. There is no economic or other theory that explains why a city called a "financial center" should be more valuable or lovely than others. Why, then, should China make developing global financial centers a vital national goal? Does China really need its own financial centers of world standing? Does the world need China to have them? Or is such a goal necessary because a financial center can determine the fate of a great metropolis?

Nothing in the history of finance, the evolution of cities, or modern economics provides a clear answer. It is the Chinese who have endowed the term "financial center" with such weight and meaning by trying to dissect the functions of such cities and quantify every detail. As a result, politicians are prepared to pick a city and order it to create the functions of a financial center, as if such a thing can be constructed like a building-a concept that could not be more off the mark.

Indeed, according to modern development models of finance, whether or not a physical center of finance exists is no longer a meaningful issue. Owing to historical factors and opportunities, financial transactions were concentrated in cities that were traditionally closely linked to the rise of European and American capitalism. But what counts nowadays is not where financial transactions physically take place, but rather the growing importance and globalization of finance in the operation of the world economy.

Cities do not become financial centers because they are more "excellent" than other cities, or because they have done something that other cities failed to do. Instead, once financial transactions begin to concentrate in a place, it becomes hard to move them to other places. A free-market economy and its legal traditions-both indispensable to the survival of financial centers-certainly helps them to rise, but that initial rise has always been attributable to historical evolution, not government strategy.

In this sense, China's effort to deliberately create, through government fiat, global financial centers is both exacting and dogmatic. There is no doubt that China needs its financial sector to develop soundly in order to ensure sustained economic growth. And there is now a common understanding in China that meeting this objective requires that the government safeguard financial liberalization.

But progress has been slow, because China's politicians have put nurturing financial centers-which should be the objective of local governments-at the heart of the country's financial development. Indeed, equating financial liberalization with privileges for cities designated as "financial centers" undermines the very goals of liberalization-namely, to reduce government control and to accelerate the development of financial markets.

China's financial system is failing in that respect, owing to frequent administrative and political intervention. As a result, Shanghai has been restricted from making the best of its financial functions, and Hong Kong, Asia's acknowledged financial center, from assisting China's financial modernization.

What China needs most is a financial sector capable of harnessing the forces of liberalization and globalization to drive economic growth in the decades ahead. The time has come to cast off the burden of building financial centers, and focus instead on advancing the modernization of Chinese finance.

Zhang Jun is Director of the China Center for Economic Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2007.
www.project-syndicate.org

  评论这张
 
阅读(180)| 评论(3)
推荐 转载

历史上的今天

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017